<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Programming and sex</title>
	<link>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/12/17/programming-sex/</link>
	<description>A little spot on the web all about me, my work and my life in general!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Re: Dot Net is sexy &#171; Rabywhyte&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/12/17/programming-sex/#comment-52512</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/12/17/programming-sex/#comment-52512</guid>
					<description>[...] Re: Dot Net is&#160;sexy  This post is a reply to Chris&#8217;s post (found here ), which spawned from Kieran&#8217;s post (found here ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Re: Dot Net is&nbsp;sexy  This post is a reply to Chris&#8217;s post (found here ), which spawned from Kieran&#8217;s post (found here ) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Worfolk&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dot Net is sexy</title>
		<link>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/12/17/programming-sex/#comment-52324</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/12/17/programming-sex/#comment-52324</guid>
					<description>[...] Having read Kieran&#8217;s post which in turn leads on to Dan Zambonini&#8217;s post about which programming language gets you most sex it got me thinking. While it does, as Dan correctly points out, vary from situation to situation, you really don&#8217;t seem to be able to go wrong with Dot Net. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Having read Kieran&#8217;s post which in turn leads on to Dan Zambonini&#8217;s post about which programming language gets you most sex it got me thinking. While it does, as Dan correctly points out, vary from situation to situation, you really don&#8217;t seem to be able to go wrong with Dot Net. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Raby Whyte</title>
		<link>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/12/17/programming-sex/#comment-52001</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/12/17/programming-sex/#comment-52001</guid>
					<description>haha, I had a chuckle reading that. If you want a mixed sex workplace, with lots of admin workers then head for CSC, i was quite suprised by the gender ratio!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, I had a chuckle reading that. If you want a mixed sex workplace, with lots of admin workers then head for CSC, i was quite suprised by the gender ratio!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
