<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trolling on news</title>
	<link>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/02/24/trolling-on-news/</link>
	<description>A little spot on the web all about me, my work and my life in general!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kieran</title>
		<link>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/02/24/trolling-on-news/#comment-13456</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/02/24/trolling-on-news/#comment-13456</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Just because it’s controversial does not mean I’m trolling
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is only true if the purpose of your post wasn't to insight a flame war. I'd love to say that I didn't believe that was your intention, but after previous discussions on the subject I know thats often why you do it - at least it certainly that has been your motive in the past which makes it less likely its for a legitimate reason this time. 

If it is legit then I apologise, however I will say I think you went about it the wrong way - there was a lot of criticism in there which hadn't been backed up well, and considering it had the potential to tar a lot of people with the same brush, it might have been a little insensitive. It certainly doesn't look to have won you many friends among the staff and indeed some students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Just because it’s controversial does not mean I’m trolling
</p></blockquote>
<p>This is only true if the purpose of your post wasn&#8217;t to insight a flame war. I&#8217;d love to say that I didn&#8217;t believe that was your intention, but after previous discussions on the subject I know thats often why you do it - at least it certainly that has been your motive in the past which makes it less likely its for a legitimate reason this time. </p>
<p>If it is legit then I apologise, however I will say I think you went about it the wrong way - there was a lot of criticism in there which hadn&#8217;t been backed up well, and considering it had the potential to tar a lot of people with the same brush, it might have been a little insensitive. It certainly doesn&#8217;t look to have won you many friends among the staff and indeed some students.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Worfolk</title>
		<link>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/02/24/trolling-on-news/#comment-13338</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kieranoshea.com/2007/02/24/trolling-on-news/#comment-13338</guid>
					<description>I can't really defend my latest pro-Windows post but my other post I think is a very valid point and one that really merits some consideration. Just because it's controversial does not mean I'm trolling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t really defend my latest pro-Windows post but my other post I think is a very valid point and one that really merits some consideration. Just because it&#8217;s controversial does not mean I&#8217;m trolling.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
